I feel it is due time to acually make a journal entry on Devart, just to prove that I can.

While I was surfing the F.B.I site, just to see where the world is at, today I noticed several odd things. The first of which is something I wasn't aware of.

Guess how tall Usama Bin Laden is?

He is estimated to be between 6 Foot 4 inches, and 6 foot 6 inches.
That is your avarage height for a basketball player. It is a funny thought, laden running around on a basketball court.

My question is, why havn't I noticed this before? Is it because I can't be bothered noticing things such as this, or something more sinister.

Anyway, moving on. If you take a look at the page of Mr "JAMES J. BULGER", (link below) It sort of looks more like a personal dating page than anything else. I quote

"Bulger is an avid reader with an interest in history. He is known to frequent libraries and historic sites. Bulger is currently on the heart medication Atenolol (50 mg) and maintains his physical fitness by walking on beaches and in parks with his female companion, Catherine Elizabeth Greig. Bulger and Greig love animals and may frequent animal shelters. Bulger has been known to alter his appearance through the use of disguises. He has traveled extensively throughout the United States, Europe, Canada, and Mexico."

Do you read that like I do, "Loves animals, reading and long walks on the beach"?

Another thing I noticed on the F.B.I site, is that every single "Computer generated" image, of what the F.B.I thought the crims would look like in 5 years, had a moustache! What is the deal with this? Do people suddenly think "Oh, I'm on the top 10 most wanted list, better grow a Moustache to hide my face"? Or is it some evil plot by te F.B.I to hunt down people with moustaches to keep the world safe? If so, it is to late, Hitler and Stalin are already dead, guys.

And they all seem to look vaugly Mexican. Must be something in the tachos, where is El Nombre when you need him.


And now onto newspapers. Opening the "Sydney Morning Herald" today I saw the headline, "Roadworks at fault in crash, inquest told".
Now, what does that suggest to you? I quote the first paragraph.

"An Accident in which a three-year-old girl was killed might have been averted had lanes been better blocked at the site of roadworks on Windsor Road, an inquest has heard"

They acually suggest in the article that roadworkers slow down lanes of traffic they arn't working on, just to stop passing drivers from being "confused" by going past the works at a normal speed. This is so bloody typical. A stupid person does something stupid (as they do) and the rest of the normal people have to suffer, because of media hyperexageration.

A further reading into the article acually reveals that
A:The driver was 2 and 1/2 times over the leagal speed limit and
B: He was going 171km/h

and yet the roadworks are blamed. Does this make any sense to you?

Top ten most wanted: [link]